After many years of looking, I have found the marriage date
for my grandmother’s sister, Ethel Elizabeth Quigley’s marriage to John Vir
Quigley.
I wasn’t looking at the time for her marriage, but instead
was working on World War I draft cards. I made a spreadsheet with the names of
all of the men in my database who were found in these draft cards. I double-checked
these names against the images on my computer and sometimes I needed to return
to Ancestry to see the actual images.
When looking at John Vir Quigley’s card, one of the hints that Ancestry showed was to the “Newspapers.com Marriage Index, 1800s-1999” database.
His name was right so I clicked on it. It was a link to The Butte Miner newspaper in Montana about the marriage of Ethel Elizabeth Sullivan to John
Vir Quigley in Burlingame, California, on 20 October 1925![1]
According to the article, Ethel, a former Anaconda girl and
daughter of John H. Sullivan, was married to John V. Quigley of San Francisco
at St. Catherine’s church in Burlingame. She used to work at the office of the
Anaconda Copper Mining Company in the brick department. Vir had visited
Anaconda many times while working for the Minerals Separation Company.[2]
The article gave wonderful information that convinced me I
was looking at the correct couple. But, I wanted more about the wedding. Perhaps
there was an article in the local Burlingame or San Mateo newspaper that might
have the announcement of their marriage or a story about the wedding.
Searching for the name “Vir Quigley” turned up nothing, so I decided to browse. There were images of The Times, a newspaper in San Mateo, for October 1925 and I found two articles in the October 21 issue. Vir and Ethel were married in the morning of the day of his parent’s fiftieth anniversary.[3] They probably picked that day because Vir’s family were all together for the anniversary celebration.[4]
Ethel’s sister, Anna, was the matron of honor, and Vir’s brother, George, was the best man. Anna was the only one from her family there. Ethel wore a dress made of silk with a hat to match and carried gardenias. It’s a shame we have no photos of the event.
Their marriage was short-lived. She died during the pregnancy
of their second child on 26 October 1927.[5]
That was the reason their son, John, didn’t know the date of his parent’s
wedding. He had only been a few months older than one years old and had no memory
of his mother.
The Tip
There were several reasons the article didn’t come up in the search. First, the
Quigley name in the wedding article was hyphenated. The algorithm does not catch
hyphenated words well. Try searching only part of the name. Think about where a
hyphen might be placed. The second reason was the image was poor quality with
missing letters and the OCR probably had trouble making out all of the words. However,
when we read our brains can often fill in the missing letters. There are still words
I’m unsure of because there are not enough letters to help me make them out.
Another tip: read the other articles in the same issue. I
have often found a second article about the same subject or found articles
about other family members. On the same page as this article was the one about Vir's parent's fiftieth anniversary party.
[1] “Married
in California,” The Butte (Montana) Miner, 22 Oct 1925, p. 11.
[2]
Ibid.
[3] “Marriage
is Celebrated,” The (San Mateo) Times, 21 Oct 1925, p. 3.
[4] “Golden
Wedding is Celebrated,” The (San Mateo) Times, 21 Oct 1925, p. 3.
[5] “Mrs.
Quigley Dies in Butte Hospital,” The Anaconda (Montana) Standard, 28 Oct
1927, p. 9.
Copyright © 2020 by Lisa S. Gorrell, My Trails into the Past. All Rights Reserved.
Great find! And how sad that Ethel died so young.
ReplyDeleteRe: your search tips - I have found the exact same thing. Don't assume that the search feature will find the articles. If you suspect your relative might be mentioned, just browse. Newspaper research can be tedious, but it's also so rewarding!
Thank you for your thoughtful comment. Newspapers are one of my favorite records because you never know what you'll find.
DeleteThank you for the tip. I would never have figured that out. Great job!
ReplyDelete