Calling all Genea-Musings Fans:
It's Saturday Night again -
time for some more Genealogy Fun!
1) Determine how complete your genealogy research
is. For background, read Crista Cowan's post Family
History All Done? What’s Your Number? and Kris Stewart's What
Is Your Genealogy "Score?" For comparison purposes,
keep the list to 10 generations with you as the first person.
2) Create a table similar to Crista's second table, and fill it in
however you can (you could create an Ahnentafel (Ancestor Name) list and count
the number in each generation, or use some other method). Tell us how you
calculated the numbers.
3) Show us your table, and calculate your "Ancestral Score" -
what is your percentage of known names to possible names (1,023 for 10
generations).
Here's mine:
I did not do this challenge back in 2016, so I have nothing
to compare to. I know that I have not added generations to my tree in a long
time except in the GORRELL line in Pennsylvania. I have been focusing on
filling in the stories of the more recent generations. But I decided to do the
challenge to have a record of my ancestral score.
I made the chart by hand because what Randy described did
not seem to work in RootsMagic 7, which I am still using. Instead, I used the
pedigree chart and worked through each generation, counting how many I have
found.
I also am starting with my daughters as no. 1, so I can
reflect both my side and my husband’s side, since I research both lines
equally.
Generation |
Relationship |
Possible People No. – Sum 1 |
Identified People No. – Sum 2 |
Percentage 100* (Sum2/Sum1) |
||
1 |
You |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
100.00% |
2 |
Parents |
2 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
100.00% |
3 |
Grandparents |
4 |
7 |
4 |
7 |
100.00% |
4 |
1x G-Grandparents |
8 |
15 |
8 |
15 |
100.00% |
5 |
2x G-Grandparents |
16 |
31 |
16 |
31 |
100.00% |
6 |
3x G-Grandparents |
32 |
63 |
32 |
63 |
100.00% |
7 |
4x G-Grandparents |
64 |
127 |
55 |
118 |
92.91% |
8 |
5x G-Grandparents |
128 |
255 |
63 |
192 |
75.29% |
9 |
6x G-Grandparents |
256 |
511 |
40 |
232 |
45.40% |
10 |
7x G-Grandparents |
512 |
1023 |
22 |
254 |
24.82% |
My Ancestral Score for 10 generations is:
* number of known ancestral names is 254, the number of possible is 1023, so the
ancestral name number for ten generations is 254/1023 = 24.82%.
My numbers drop off fast at a couple of locations:
--On my father’s side, I do not know the parents of Irish-born
Jerry and Mary (Sheehan) Sullivan of County Cork. Nor the Irish-born parents of Martin &
Ann Gleeson and John Tierney & Ann Murray, probably of County Tipperary. I also
do not know the parents of German-born Susanna Raduntz, who lived in
Schneidemuehl, Prussia. Or the parents of Christoph Siewert & Anna Marianna
Ewald, also living in Schneidemuehl.
--On my husbands’ father’s side, there are gaps in his
Swedish Nilsen line, not knowing the parents of Anders Peter Johansson and his
wife Anna Larsdotter, who lived in Rappestad, Östergötland, Sweden. This is an
area I could attend to locate their origins. There are also gaps for the
parents of James Davey & Elizabeth Hocking, and Edward Nicholas and Susanna
Phillips, all of County Cornwall in England. I also don’t have parents for
Sarah Milholland and Sarah Duffield. These women were living in Pennsylvania
and may have originated in Virginia.
--My mother’s side goes deep in American history, but all in
the south, where some lines have dead ends, such as the parents for Samuel
Johnston and his wife Elizabeth McCormack; and Benjamin W. Jones, who was
married to Amanda A. Haley. Lots of gaps in the 5x-great-grandparents of my
children.
I need some work products for my BCG renewal in two years.
Perhaps one of the missing links would be a great place to start.
Your percentages are excellent for Generation 6 and earlier. Unless the local church registers have been lost, your Swedish gap looks like it might be the easiest to pursue.
ReplyDeleteI worked on that line so many years ago and don't remember why there is that gap. Now with ArkivDigital available at the FHC, I can try to tackle that line.
DeleteI also research my line and my husband's line equally so I like your idea of including the next generation as generation #1. Although I use RM7 your chart is extremely readable!
ReplyDeleteI have not seen this scoring before. But, like you, I am 100% through gen 6. At gen 7, I have 51 of 64 and of course it gets worse from there. For 2022 I am focusing on my 4th great-grandparents, finding those missing 13 will undoubtedly help my score since they should lead me to the many missing names in gens 8 to 10. Thanks for sharing!
ReplyDeleteGood luck on your search.
Delete